Definitions are rather crucial. What do I mean by religion? What do I mean by tradition? What do I mean by Nationality? And far too easy to suggest that someone who practices a religion or observes a tradition primarily because he or she considers it central to social cohesion is therefore somehow alienated. Or has lost his or her religion, or has lost his or her contact with a tradition, or who is for one reason or another expatriated.
Here I'd argue that The Pope doesn't have to believe in the Resurrection to be
The Pope. What he has to do is to persuade others that he believes in the
Resurrection. And why might he pursue such a deceit? Because he wants to
be The Pope. And I can say this, because we as individuals, "Join" ideas.
We do not "Belong," to ideas. Infuriating, I know, because barriers to
membership can be insurmountable, no matter how the 'heart' might yearn to
'belong.' Wittgenstein wanted to belong to the class of Genius.
Scruton wants to belong to the class of philosopher. And to my
un-contactable comrade, there is no such thing as a flawed novel, unless you
have joined an idea of what a novel might be.